This is how you know you’ve had a conversation with the Far Right:
Because Tex Taylor (a self-proclaimed God-fearing “educated attorney and medical student“) is too scared to come to my blog (waving the white flag of surrender) and challenge my “shallow speech”, he wrote the following comment in the comment section of someone else’s blog:
Oh no, Virgo. Nobody can forget that name or that gravatar. I took a look at your blog. Don’t fool yourself. You’re anything but grounded, fair or deep, and feeling about politics is exactly why libs don’t get it. I’ll tell you what. Wickle’s blog is not the proper place for me to point out how muddled your thinking is. Why don’t we agree to meet sometime over at Chen’s board where I feel like I’ve got a little more room to ‘eviscerate’ some of your, shall we say, “deeper” thoughts you’ve posted on your blog. I’ve found libbies like you, once challenged, have a sneaky habit of censoring comments when they get angry. Simply put, I don’t trust you or your type.
Well, as you can see in Deanna’s blog, there is some history not only with her, but also with the author of “Ideas and Revolution” as well. He seems to have a reputation for going from one liberal blog to the next with personal attacks and then has the audacity to label comment policies that forbid ad hominem attacks “a sneaky libbie” thing. 
Basically what Tex Taylor is looking for is free therapy. He has a lot of pent up anger and is looking for people that will allow him to walk all over them. Beating his wife, children and dog probably isn’t enough for him.
Little does he realize that his own party has similar policies on their blogs. Clearly, he has no clue about what he’s talking about.
He continues….
“…Since I’ve often witnessed your comments on Chen’s board before and found them ‘flaccid’ and shallow, never bothering to think them worthy of comment, …”
Classic!
I’ve only noticed Chen’s blog from either May or June. And I have only very rarely commented there. I’d say probably about 6 or 7 times out of which two of my comments could have possibly been meaningless.
Notice how he makes no effort to back himself up, but I have a feeling that the “shallow comment” that I made was here. Anyway, if that was the “shallow comment” that he was referring to (and believe me, I was expecting that kind of response from some neocon to point out the shallowness which is how I found that comment so quickly) that was just the short version of how I really felt. Not that he’d really care about what I had meant by that response, anyway, as apparently all Obama supporters are shallow mindless sheeple that sit around all day collecting welfare and sipping kool-aid. 
Or better yet….
a Godless, Jew-hating, weenie, Nazi-appeasing-Hitler-apologist, hairy, smelly, tie-dye, tree-hugging, weed-smoking, homo-loving-marriage-destroying, lazy-welfare-mongering, acid-tripping, baby-killing, kool-aid-drinking, broccoli-granola-soy-tofu-eating vegan, treasonous, bra-burning, flag-burning, draftcard-burning, bleeding-heart, Jane-Fonda-loving and Charles Manson-admiring, constitution/freedom-hating, Anti-American incessant-whiner pinko commie A-rab-terrorist-sympathizer who has a hidden agenda to overthrow the American government and its people.
But I’m not holding my breath! Surely enough, he won’t challenge any of my words. A civil debate is out of the question. We “shallow untrustworthy libbies” realize that’s how you knee-jerk reactionaries roll. It’s not even about politics any more. It’s about lazy people that just talk but don’t take the time to listen, understand, and research. Critical thinking is a dirty word.
Same talking points
Same rhetoric
Same baseless conclusions
Same ad hominem used in their self-proclaimed “deep arguments”
Same misconstruing other people’s words and comments to mean something entirely different. As you can see from this comment alone targeted at someone else, Tex Taylor is the poster-child of your one-dimensional simpleton who sees the world and its people with a narrow black and white mentality – rather than recognizing that there are grays everywhere. And he’s the same person that calls himself “deep”.
Same pots calling the kettle black
Same shoot first ask questions later
Same people deathly afraid of facts
Different day
Different self-righteous neocon
Note to those like Tex Taylor: Try to get to know a little bit more about my blog (that is what those links at the head of my page are there for) before you jump to inane conclusions about me and what I write. If you want to be taken seriously, you probably want to quote me and back yourself up and follow-up. Otherwise, you’ll look shallow. I mean, you don’t want to sound like a hypocrite, do you?
My Final Response to him after another round :
I have a personal testimonial? Where? (He had mentioned that I had a personal testimonial on my blog) 
By the way honey love, what was it I misspelled?
It’s “through” not “thru”.
Fair enough…take your pick of any moronic post you addressed to me on Wickle’s blog. All were long on context, rambling, and light on substance. You must have been catching a buzz because it appeared your words started slurring across the page.
See, you’re the one making the accusations. So, you’re the one responsible for the burden of proof. Quoting would be helpful. Line by line.
If you want me to get specific, how about the first one where you accused me of being the zealot feminist? That alone ought to create a few chuckles on this board.
Suggesting that anyone who is not a fan of Palin is jealous is obviously demeaning to stay-at-home mothers. Because people like you only give score points to career mothers who have big families and hunt. Also, your usage of the word jealousy to describe those that criticize her is old – very overused by your kind and tired. Some originality would be refreshing as your statements are in every right-wing blog. The mere suggesting that someone is jealous of one just because they are critical of them is as juvenile as one can get.
You know the post I speak of, right love? The one that vacillated between a rant, baby talk, a sermon, an insult, and a question? Some problem about you being the housewife, and the one where you don’t hunt, and you being all woman? I am woman, hear me roar?
I took a look at your pic. I took a look at Sarah’s pic. That is all I need to know about the enraged envy and misguided hatred.
P.S.
Anybody that is a militant atheist as you apparently are, is beyond stupid in my book .
See, Tex, speaking of “painful”… That’s all you can do is name-call and resort to ad hominem attacks on people’s character and looks. Sad. Your looks can’t be that great if all you have the balls to show is your eyeball.
It tells me that you don’t have an argument, so you fill in the void with insulting language and intolerance against those that have a different opinion than yourself.
And you expect me and others to take you seriously?
It tells me that I can’t defend myself and that I must just sit here and have you tell me everything that is wrong with me. I have much more respect for myself than to listen to your verbal abuse that you imply to be “deep, rational, and morally superior”. You need to get over yourself, really. You are giving yourself more credit than you deserve.
You can’t argue one on one. Unlike you, I am not worried about an “internet reputation”. I call things as I see them. You don’t have to agree. Nobody does. Get over the fact that others may look at life differently.
You find comfort over here because you know that people will defend you. That is cowardly. The reason my blog is painful for you is because you are too scared to fight alone. Do you not realize how transparent your behavior is? It comes to me as no surprise that you have been banned and censored from other blogs.
You go ahead and find another “ass to kick in front of the whole world” to make yourself feel better about yourself. Your ego must need it. You surely sound very insecure and lonely wherever you are, and I am not going to apologize for not rubbing your ego.
I won’t be back here – nor will I continue this useless argument. You just want someone to not debate with, but to fight with. There are plenty of other people in cyberspace I am sure that will be happy to get into a mud-slinging “put down match” with you. I am not one of them. Sorry.
I may be an atheist. But your self-proclaimed “Christianity” is not convincing as by what you have just written, doesn’t sound like any TRUE Christian that I know.
It’s been nice to have met you, anyway. I think you need a hug. I am sure somebody will give you one. Take care and feel better soon, love. 
by virgomonkey November 16, 2008 at 10:49 pm
I wonder how I am a “militant atheist”? This comment was also very amusing as this is just another thing he’s pulled out of his ass from god-knows-where.
This guy isn’t your average right-winger. I have never seen anybody get so defensive over a presidential candidate such as Sarah Palin to the point where if you don’t support her it’s because you’re jealous of her. The most ridiculous part of this argument is what if a man doesn’t like Palin? How can a man be jealous of Palin? As far as women are concerned, what about GWB? Am I jealous of Dumya because I criticize him?
This brand of right-wingnuts are as dumb as a brick. He’s proof that our education system needs to be revamped. It is no wonder why the rest the world judges us so harshly. People like Tex Taylor give the United States an embarrassing name. I am thankful, however, that there are more civil and reasonable Conservatives out there. Actually, those like Tex are in the minority. I only very rarely come across his kind. And I am grateful for that. There is still hope for humanity.
Tex Taylor deserves a special appearance on my blog. This is just to show you that it’s not only the “Looney Libbies” that make utter fools out of themselves in public.
End Note: I must say I am quite flattered, though, that Tex Taylor has taken the time to read all the 350 posts I have written on my blog. So, I really can’t judge him that harshly, can I?
P.S. If anyone wants to see how the rest of the “debate about Sarah Palin” panned out, you can read the rest here. Chen’s Chamber Lounge is password protected, but here’s the direct link for those that have access.
From one who is in denial that Anti-Americanism 
((
Americanophobia, Anti-Americanism, atl, blog banning, blog trolls, clearing the air, comment policy, country vs continent, dealing with trolls, europe vs america, european anti-americanism, hormonal teenagers, juan mcdanialisms, kids with keyboards, lol, teen hut, teen hut anti-americanism, the 1st amendment, the misconceptions of free speech, wtf
Continents vs Countries, Rebuttals, and Clearing the Air
In Americanophobia, Blame Europe, Censorship / Freedom of Speech, Troll Droppings and Responses on January 2, 2009 at 3:14 PMCountry vs Continent? I’ve been indirectly “paged” so to speak on my hypocrisy of having found it odd that a European compares the diversity of Europe vs the United States. Yes, it is entirely unfair for anybody to draw conclusions about a nation based on how they pale in comparison with a CONTINENT of 49 countries. And I firmly believe that everyone agrees with me there. The intent of the “bloggers” that wrote this piece is crystal clear – yet they deny any bias or motives.
With that said, I have been accused of hypocrisy due to writing about Euronationalist Americanophobia.
Here’s a little hint: If you call yourselves Europeans, will we note you as such and return the favor. In case you missed it, Americans call themselves “Americans” - not “North Americans”. We, unlike some Europeans, recognize ourselves as a country and *not* a continent. The map on this page may be of some assistance.
FREE SPEECH: One more thing I’d like to clear up before I go. Dissent is perfectly acceptable on this blog. If you are familiar with my blog, you will see tons of debates throughout between people all over the world. But you must ask yourselves the following questions before commenting:
Coming to one’s blog to comment is synonymous to being a guest in one’s home. You are not protected under the United States Amendment of Free Speech granted by the government. For the record, every developed country has rights to free speech. But this has nothing to do with blogging. Apples and oranges. Just ask yourself – if you go to a person’s house to vandalize and act like a total ass, and they kick you out, are you going to cry like a baby that they don’t allow free speech or dissent?
This reminds me of a quote that rings true here:
Another thing that people with a short fuse tend to forget is that there is a HUGE difference between DISSENT and SILENCING SPEECH. It’s funny how only those banned for not adhering to my comment policy seem to continue to cry about how I’m a speech-silencer of some sort. Everyone is aware when they comment here how this blog works and don’t have any excuse to act surprised.
This has nothing to do with being American as much as having high standards for stimulating and thought-provoking debate. Here is a perfect example for those that are a little slow.
It’s most amusing that the same people that moan and groan about censorship are those same people that have me banned from their blog.
Hmm….. Learn the meaning of censorship. Censorship would be if I banned speech from someone else’s blog. But coming from Aby and co., I am not the least bit surprised at the perpetual ignorance.
Now, for some fun stuff!
Aby “the liberal- the ‘Internationalist’” and her crew now have an entire forum on the internet devoted to me and all around American-bashing under the guise of “helping teens”. (The message board is OWNED by them.) It’s a riot! I’ve received ample hits from them, and now I feel like a celebrity!!
I’m not even going to bother rebutting the other arguments against me because they’re not being honest and not worth my time. How do you respond to lies?
To make matters more interesting, here are the rules that Aby and co. made for those who utilize their site:
Interesting. I have also noticed some of the members to be complaining about Juan McDaniel (Aby “the liberal”’s partner in crime) deleting some member’s posts… for possibly… dissent… perhaps? !!
Uh oh.
Hee hee. Oops. Deleting innocuous dissent that may give away his little game secrets? This is f’n hilarious! And for the record, this post was just deleted!
Another complaint about deleting dissent:
In case you’re confused, Aby’s “partner in crime” AKA (“the protector of mankind)
goes under the following names:
- Captain Sasha
- Sasha
- Captain V
- Juan McDaniel
- Captain (Dr.) Alexandr Vasilevski
- Karmen
- Amy
- Bridgette
and god knows what else.
It is now confirmed that I’m dealing with hormonal teenagers!