Welcome to my blog

Archive for the ‘Religion’ Category

No thank you, Government. Please never tell me what a “family value” is.

In Censorship / Freedom of Speech, Religion, ScarahPalinisms, War and Politics, Wordpress Political Blogs on December 30, 2008 at 6:56 PM

One particular thing that annoys me about Neo-Conservativism is this so called “family values” being forced down one’s throat. Why do I need the government or my fellow “conservatives” to tell me what a “family value” is? Do YOU believe that a government should dictate what a “family value” is or should it be up to the individual?

Having as many kids as I can pop out, my husband and I working 16 hours a day while the kids are at day care and bible school, never spending quality time with the husband and kids — while the kids go absolutely nuts without having parents around unless they are with a paddle with spikes on it, and then the kids becoming mentally ill and start committing crimes and/or becoming just as depressed, bitter and as neurotic at their parents just to rinse and repeat into future generations? All under the guise of being a “good Christian” and going to church two times a week? Apparently, this is why the so called “conservatives” like to keep the Mexicans here illegally (work hard – have family values)? Misery loves company? Naw. That’s not for me, folks. And that’s not “pre-Gingrich” Conservatism either. That’s living miserably and expecting everyone to fall into the dirty puddle with you – making the same stupid mistakes in life.

The Radical Conservatives have hijacked Conservatism. What a family value is, should always be protected under the first amendment.

I prefer what the French call “family values”.

What I find particularly weird is that some people who call themselves “family-oriented” have the most jacked-up and dysfunctional family. The thing is that they are clever enough to hide it well. They attend all these superficial “family functions” just to be there – just to say they were there – just to say that they “value the family”. However, being physically there at a family gathering and being emotionally there in peace and in love are two totally different things.

Call me a liberal. But I don’t owe homage to anybody or anything. Respect is earned, in my book. And if you are in a toxic relationship and don’t distance yourself from it, you’re just as stupid as the abuser. Of course, “what is toxic” is up to individual interpretation.

I’d like to think that we spend our precious time with those who truly (not love), but like us and make us feel good and special in our own skins. Those people you can truly be yourselves around. Those are the people that I like to pal around with. :)

The Jewish 78% – Wingnuts Pressing the Panic Button

In Americanophobia, Armchair Anthropology, Election 2008, Religion, War and Politics, Wordpress Political Blogs on November 14, 2008 at 3:39 PM

Seventy-eight percent of American Jews voted for Barack Obama.

How do you like that?

The National Jewish Democratic Council Commends the Election of Obama

WASHINGTON, Nov. 5  /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — Marc R. Stanley, Chairman of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), released the following statement:

Although some votes are still being counted, there are three certain outcomes to this election. The next leader of the United States of America will be President-elect Barack Obama, the Democrats have increased their lead in both the Senate and House, and American Jewish voters have once again overwhelmingly supported the Democratic Presidential nominee.
Obama clinched the vast majority of the Jewish vote, receiving 77% according to MSNBC exit polls Tuesday evening (Senator John McCain received 22%).

We congratulate Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden on this historic victory. This year, the American people and Jewish voters sent a clear message rejecting a continuation of four more years of failed Republican policies and leadership.
With Obama’s victory, we selected a candidate who shares the values of the vast majority of American Jews, including the separation of church and state, a strong U.S.- Israel relationship, and reproductive freedom.

This makes the far Right not angry, but furious, confused, anxious, grasping at straws, making excuses, creating hate-speech, and going as far as spreading baseless and inane conspiracy theories to excuse American Jews for being Democratic… and the Liberal majority.

American Jews have always made up the majority of our Progressive population here in the United States. Additionally, it is common knowledge that Jewish Americans are critical thinkers and more intelligent than your average American. Most of them graduate from high school and college with honors, they are self-sufficient, less violent, rarely do you find them on welfare, most of them are in very professional careers, and they make more money than most.

They are family oriented, good looking, health-conscious, get married and have children.

Jews – religious or not – are rarely found to be fanatical and obsessive about their religion. It is a private issue for them. They are not interested in “spreading the word” or “recruiting new members”. I respect them for that. That alone makes them more tolerant and considerate of their neighbors.

Jewish people have a deep thirst for knowledge, and can be very kind people too. THAT’S why they are liberals. Not the estranged far Leftists, but Liberals – by its very own definition.

Republicans secretly (and sometimes not so secretly) hate Jews for this. Republicans hate the amount of money Jews make and they are jealous of their success. And to find out that they are *gasps* Liberal Progressives, only cements that hatred.

Jewish people are, by far, the most successful people. They are always winning Nobel prizes. As of today, they are up to their 159th Nobel prize and counting! They have done more for the US than we’ll admit or even begin to appreciate.

And the above is what irritates Republicans. Neo-Conservatives want the Liberals to be the “blacks-n-Mexicans on welfare” party so badly. And they are pissed that it isn’t the case. When you ever hear a Neocon talking about “socialism”, you’ll hear them make derogatory generalizations about the Democratic party saying that we are all just “lazy jobless welfare-mongers” out to get a free ride (of course with the exception of Joe the Plumber ;-) ). When they hear that 78% of the Jews voted for Obama, they realize that the stereotype of the the liberal is incorrect.

So, they press the panic button.

They go into a sweaty-palmed frenzy and try to brainstorm reasons as to why the Jews mostly vote liberal. I have heard all sorts of wild and desperate justifications that just make me shake my head:

  • Jewish Stockholm Syndrome: “The Jewish Americans have always been oppressed by the Democratic Party that they have bonded (aka trauma-bonding) to their oppressor and can’t let go”. (In other words, they have a severe cast of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder that they’re in denial of.)
  • Jewish people hate themselves like all liberals. (Again suggesting that they are mentally ill/clinically depressed).
  • Jewish voters were simply duped by the rhetoric about how the whole world will hold hands and sing, once America stops standing up for democracy.” (An implication that Jewish people are gullible, dumb, don’t know what democracy is, miss Hitler, and are naive)
  • They have “Jewish Guilt Syndrome”. (Once again, a suggestion that they are neurotic)
  • “Voting for Obama is pretty much like lining up to enter the boxcars.” (Here suggesting that they are suicidal and/or very depressed individuals – again shows mental instability.)
  • The majority of American Jews are non-observant, and therefore have no vested interest in Judaism or Israel. Observant Jews understand what they face under Obama, and rightly voted for McCain.” (Heavily suggesting here that there is a correlation between being God-fearing and informed, and that those who aren’t God-fearing are ignorant and clueless.)

This is what the far Right would rather believe that all Liberal Democrats just want to stay at home, play video games and get paid by Hitler Obama to do so…. which is just utterly ridiculous. And it says quite a lot about the far Right’s own intelligence and mental disposition that THEY are in denial of.

Sadly enough, the Right-wingnuts have deduced Rahm Emanuel to not being pro-Israel as he is a “Liberal” too. And a Liberal cannot possibly be pro-Israel. :roll: However, the Left are upset because they feel Obama has already abandoned them.

Go figure…

Just look at the below blog entry and comment section over at  Moonbattery.com. The far Righteous 10-commandment-following Right is supposed to be the party of “Judge not less be judged”, tolerance, and most importantly pro-Israel and pro-Jew. I thought it was supposed to be the far Left that were anti-Semites until I read the comment section following this post:

Jews Went Heavily for Hamas-Endorsed Obama


What about the far Left?

Now, I do not believe that general American liberals are anti-Semites. I’m sure there are some on the far Left in the US. But where this bigotry is the most noticeable for me is in other western civilizations such as Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia. To them, Jews (no matter their place of birth) are Americans. And your average American is hated passionately in these areas by the Americanophobic Left-wingnuts.

Unlike the far Right, the far Left Americanophobes are unaware that American Jews are progressive-minded. Once these people find out that American Jews like Obama, they will be equally sweaty-palmed and confused as their far Right-wingnut counterparts.

They too, may have to press the panic button.

The British Left, Youtube, Pat Condell, and the Muslim Extremists We Must Fight For!

In Americanophobia, Blame Canada, Blame Europe, Censorship / Freedom of Speech, Current Affairs, Religion, War and Politics, Wordpress Political Blogs on October 2, 2008 at 12:40 PM

Is it not interesting that on Youtube, (a website monitored by American-big-brother) bigoted hate speech (not criticism of US policies) against Americans is perfectly acceptable? Think about it. However, dare you say anything badly about Islam, your video will be banned or close to it. This is not, actually, the first time this has happened either. (Cartoons also making fun of Mohammed are also not very nice….)

But, wait a minute! Aren’t the Bush-loving-warmongering-red-white-and-blue-McD-Walmart-Americans in charge of monitoring and taking names on Youtube supposed to be banning hate speech against Americans along with Islamic hate speech?

Just some food for thought. :)

Feel free to see the video on Pat Condell’s homepage.

Pat, hold on a second, I thought the biggest problem facing Britain right now was McDonalds and denim jeans. Are you actually trying to say you find that Sharia Law and Muslim Extremism could actually be worse than walking past a Coca-Cola sign? Please tell me it isn’t so……

I don’t actually think anything will be done about Sharia Law in Britain. The Americanophobic Radical Left are too busy trying to persuade Americans that Bush is bad. (Psst… we’re still waiting for you to tell us something we don’t know…) But by the hair of their chins with any residual fight left in them at all, the Americanophobic zealots are trying to hold up Sharia law because anything other than that would be “racist”. I love the irony! Never mind that all these British “activists” are defending Muslim extremism at the expense of women’s rights (the very movement that they have historically stood behind, to make things even more ironic…) It is always fascinating how so many Americanophobes defend, protect, and even condone Islamic Fundamentalism, but should a flight attendant wear a cross, it is considered highly offensive. ;-) <—(Psst… that’s cuz God waz invented in AmeriKKKa, so……)

We can see this example here.

Nadia Eweida, who worked for British Airways, came to work wearing a necklace with a little cross on it.

Nadia Eweida (55), a Coptic Christian whose father is Egyptian and mother English, working for seven years at British Airways as a luggage inspector, was suspended from work for two weeks without pay because of wearing a cross.

The airline’s uniform code states that staff must not wear visible jewellery or other ‘adornments’ while on duty without permission from management. It makes exceptions for Muslim and Sikh minorities by allowing them to wear hijabs and turbans.

Congratulations to the Elitist Left. You have hit a home run.

UPDATE:

It turns out that Pat Condell’s video, “Saudi Britain” was taken down as Pat said that the country was mentally ill. There are over 1000 videos of that similarity to the US and its citizens. They are never taken down by Youtube. Americans are overseeing the site and agree with the Americanophobic attitudes. Like I mention often in my blog, nobody hates America more than Americans, themselves. If you’re interested in this topic, feel free to read how Americans are the most self-critical people in the world and condone all forms of Anti-Americanism. Yep. That is something you’ll never hear on the BBC, CBC, Al Jazeera, and all of your other favorite tabloids. ;-)

Are people THAT thick?

In Americanophobia, Blame Canada, Religion, War and Politics on May 3, 2008 at 6:07 PM

There is a DIFFERENCE between Islam and Islamic Fundamentalism.

There is a DIFFERENCE between Christianity and Christian Fanaticism.

There is a DIFFERENCE between being a Canadian and an Americanophobic Canadian.

There is a DIFFERENCE between being an American and a Racist American.

There is a DIFFERENCE between being a European and an Americanophobic European.

There is a DIFFERENCE between being a moderate, a liberal, a radical liberal, a conservative, and a radical conservative.

There is a DIFFERENCE between being a Patriot and an Arrogant Blind Patriot.

There is a DIFFERENCE between Anti-American-Government and Anti-American.

There is a DIFFERENCE between LEGAL immigration and ILLEGAL immigration.

My glossary is a work in progress. Please check it out. This may help clear some things up.

How Americanophobia is Not Only Hypocritical, but Nonproductive and Nonconstructive (Part I)

In Americanophobia, Blame Canada, Current Affairs, Religion, War and Politics on April 30, 2008 at 10:35 AM

It hit me quite some time ago that on just about every account where Americans are criticized, the accusers themselves are guilty of the same thing or guilty of *isolating* Americans in a world where Americans should be *included*. (European and Canadian Bias under the Microscope)

My inspiration for this post: (Why do people worldwide increasingly continue to hate America?)

Let’s start with our overall “genocidal behaviors”:

One German citizen (Robin Hood Im Schwarzwald) wrote in his blog a piece that rang so true for me:

Some Europeans display a moral superiority that is inconsistent with reality. However, that does not stop leftists from protesting in the streets about no-blood-for-oil, but when is the last time you see anything of consequence protesting the Chinese, Iranians, Radical Islam, or any other despotic regime? I would guess almost never! Even so that doesn’t stop leftists or cultural elites from perpetuating stereotypes of Americans and America.

Hat Tip: Schwarzwald

Americanophobes will tell you that America has been the only evil and persists to be the only evil. What Americanophobes conveniently fail to include or acknowledge is the following:

Another example of how our NATO “friends” are exercising blatantly obvious bias concerning their judgment of the US is noted in this article, “What should enrage every decent citizen is that the real torturers — from Zimbabwe to China, from Syria to North Korea — get a pass from the political left“.

From our ailing domestic left to overseas America haters, no one really cares about the fate of Mustapha the Murderer or Ahmed the Assassin. The lies told about Gitmo are meant to undercut U.S. foreign policy and embarrass America.

The Gitmo controversy is about many things, from jealousy of the United States and outrage that we refuse to fail, to residual anger that we won the Cold War and exploded the left’s great fantasy of a dictatorship of the intellectuals. But the one thing the protests aren’t about is human rights.

Read on to see that Americanophobes in Europe and in Canada don’t mind violence, mass murder, and torture at all. In fact, they approve of it. So, what is it, then, that makes them dislike us so…..?

America is now the Superpower of the world. While it’s not something to be jealous of, one is to only assume jealousy — as we’re the country of the world’s obsession, and a lot of those countries that are pouting and shaking their fists at us are the same countries that either feel threatened by our imperialism or jealous because they once used to be the leaders of the world and they no longer have that power (especially Britain). So, by consistently pointing out our faults, we see that this is the only way these anti-American countries can attempt to make us feel worthless. It’s a way of bullying us off of our “high and mighty” thrones. It seeks to humble us. It seeks to have us put our flags down. While some of the criticism directed at us IS note-worthy and merited, the convenient ignorance of other evils both past and present is clearly a sign that it’s not “evil” that anti-Americanism is against. There’s something else. What else could that be? Again… jealousy?

Anti-Americanism has its roots in British and French inherited complexes when the United States stepped in to save Europe from Nazism. As former leading world powers the idea that they had been usurped was difficult for many to accept. This resentment took root as the United States began to dominate the world scene economically, politically and culturally.

Side note: When it says “we” saved Europe from Nazism, “we” is all those who weren’t a part of the Axis of Evil during that time.

Oh, the horror about Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib! Damn Americans! Hmm… funny how THIS gets overlooked…… Well, of course, it went “unconfirmed” because it never happened, right?

Hat Tip: David

With the index finger flapping away in disapproval, it never ceases to amaze me how many people from all over the world find that Americans are committing a genocide in Iraq. The war in Iraq, while I’m still not convinced it is a just war, I can tell you that it’s *not* a genocide. What is a Genocide? The deliberate, planned and systematic destruction of an *entire* ethnic, racial, religious, or national group. While I don’t support Bush, he is NOT another Hitler, rather, he’s a war criminal. There’s a difference. A BIG difference.

Number 2: Religious Fanaticism

Out of the majority of Americans that believe in God, within that group exists Christian Fanaticism. Because of this, Americans are seen as the biggest evil in the world. I call these people the “thou-shall-notters” (not any different from the Radical Left, mind you). They are on their high horse preaching to the world about how we should ‘be’ and not ‘be’ simultaneously being in denial of their own immorality. However, praise, support, and tolerance is, without question, extended to Islamic Fanaticism.

We can see this example here.

Nadia Eweida, who worked for British Airways, came to work wearing a necklace with a little cross on it.

Nadia Eweida (55), a Coptic Christian whose father is Egyptian and mother English, working for seven years at British Airways as a luggage inspector, was suspended from work for two weeks without pay because of wearing a cross.

The airline’s uniform code states that staff must not wear visible jewellery or other ‘adornments’ while on duty without permission from management. It makes exceptions for Muslim and Sikh minorities by allowing them to wear hijabs and turbans.

Hat Tip: Karin Quade

Does anyone else not find this hypocritical? Here we have an example of the elitists condemning the cross, but making exceptions for Islamofascism? Very interesting. You can find another juicy example of that here: “British Muslim ‘bullied’ for converting to Christianity“.

Yet another telling example from the History News Network:

During anti-war demonstrations in Britain left-wing marchers have unashamedly waved banners defending known terrorists, shouted abuse at American tourists and British pro-American supporters and described George Bush in terms usually reserved for serial killers. Banners decrying the attacks of 9/11 were nowhere to be seen. When Daniel Pearl was murdered there was no outcry from the left in Britain. Instead, leftist and liberal commentators concentrated their critical faculties on the treatment of Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners at Gauntanamo.

We can see here that the Americanophobic British like Islamic Fanaticism. Americanophobia blindly encourages and supports Islamofascism and their violent ways such as burning cars, burning embassies, attacks against the police, gang rapes of Infidel girls, wife beating, honor killings, the Madrid bombings, and last but not least the London bombings. Well, one can argue that the British didn’t like it happening to them, but at least we can safely say that Islamofascism is considered “OK” and embraced in Europe and in Canada.


Let’s take a look at Canada. She claims to be the “country of peace” and strongly (flapping the index finger) AGAINST the death penalty. …..That was until 9-11.

But of course there’s no hypocrisy in being pro-peace and against the death penalty, unless… death targets the RIGHT group. ;-)

Americanophobic Canadians say, “We share common cause with the Islamic Terrorists“.

“Far from being unreasonable fanatics, the terrorists fight for the same things we do. We have a common enemy.”

The common enemy the Canadians and the Islamic Terrorists share is America. Canadian Kevin Potvin shared the following after 9-11:

“When I saw the first tower cascade down into that enormous plume of dust and paper, there was a little voice inside me that said, “Yeah!” When the second tower came down the same way, that little voice said, “Beautiful!” When the visage of the Pentagon appeared on the TV with a gaping and smoking hole in its side, that little voice had nearly taken me over, and I felt an urge to pump my fist in the air”.

And he’s not the only Canadian that felt this way. By several onlookers, Americanophobic Canadians were visibly seen cheering wildly following the terrorists attacks. Examples of this very happy day in Canada can be seen if you look at my 9-11 tags here on my blog.

While Christian Fanaticism can be oppressive, violent, xenophobic, uneducated, arrogant, and is associated with Neo-Conservatism, — Americanophobia takes sides with the MORE oppressive, xenophobic, uneducated, arrogant, and politically extreme such as “The Religion of Peace” (Islamofacsism) as we know it.

But anyway, let’s hope that Canada and Europe never have to find out what living under Sharia Holy Law is like.

It’s time to talk about how Americans are Stupid, Arrogant, Superficial and blind Patriotic Flag Wavers

In the Hudson Review, Bruce Bawer states the following:

I moved from the U.S. to Europe in 1998, and I’ve been drawing comparisons ever since. Living in turn in the Netherlands, where kids come out of high school able to speak four languages, where gay marriage is a non-issue, and where book-buying levels are the world’s highest, and in Norway, where a staggering percentage of people read three newspapers a day and where respect for learning is reflected even in Oslo place names (“Professor Aschehoug Square”; “Professor Birkeland Road”), I was tempted at one point to write a book lamenting Americans’ anti-intellectualism—their indifference to foreign languages, ignorance of history, indifference to academic achievement, susceptibility to vulgar religion and trash TV, and so forth. On point after point, I would argue, Europe had us beat.

Yet as my weeks in the Old World stretched into months and then years, my perceptions shifted. Yes, many Europeans were book lovers—but which country’s literature most engaged them? Many of them revered education—but to which country’s universities did they most wish to send their children? (Answer: the same country that performs the majority of the world’s scientific research and wins most of the Nobel Prizes.) Yes, American television was responsible for drivel like “The Ricki Lake Show”—but Europeans, I learned, watched this stuff just as eagerly as Americans did (only to turn around, of course, and mock it as a reflection of American boorishness). No, Europeans weren’t Bible-thumpers—but the Continent’s ever-growing Muslim population, I had come to realize, represented even more of a threat to pluralist democracy than fundamentalist Christians did in the U.S. And yes, more Europeans were multilingual—but then, if each of the fifty states had its own language, Americans would be multilingual, too. I’d marveled at Norwegians’ newspaper consumption; but what did they actually readin those newspapers?

See, it’s not about reading, in general, that makes you ’smart’, but more to do with WHAT you’re reading. If they’re reading nothing but misinformation and garbage, then they’ve got nothing to brag about, really.

Read on to see even more hypocrisy of the Americanophobic Movement. You will also find out that at the end of the day, we’re actually not so different from one another.

Take a look at the top pet issues that the German media covers in the US by going to this blog entry written by David Kaspar. He comments on the German Americanophobic Hypocrisy:

Interestingly enough – the same European elites who complain about the supposed black-white world view of the American friends themselves enthusiastically disseminate and consume a hyper-simplified view of the United States (characterized by the pet issues listed above) that largely ignores the complexity, diversity and sheer expanse of the American experience.

Thank you, David!

I’ve realized these days, after seeing my people being attacked online constantly and outside in the world visiting other countries, that I’m starting to become even more patriotic than I ever have. In the past, before I ever realized how religious and vile Americanophobia was, I sometimes caught myself being pessimistic, feeling that America was doomed, becoming a third world country, becoming stupider and more violent every day while living under the reign of a Bushy Administration and a faux Democracy while watching our freedoms get stripped away by the radical Left and Right wings. To any non-Americans reading this, you may not see, often enough, Americans online discussing how depressed we are as some of us would rather repress what’s going on to find that being in denial allows us to keep our sanity until it’s time to vote again.

However, I realize that it’s not so bad to be an American and not so bad to be living here either – especially after reading this – which only reinforces what I’ve been feeling over the past few months.

This experience was only part of a larger process of edification. Living in Europe, I gradually came to appreciate American virtues I’d always taken for granted, or even disdained—among them a lack of self-seriousness, a grasp of irony and self-deprecating humor, a friendly informality with strangers, an unashamed curiosity, an openness to new experience, an innate optimism, a willingness to think for oneself and speak one’s mind and question the accepted way of doing things. (One reason why Europeans view Americans as ignorant is that when we don’t know something, we’re more likely to admit it freely and ask questions.) While Americans, I saw, cherished liberty, Europeans tended to take it for granted or dismiss it as a naïve or cynical, and somehow vaguely embarrassing, American fiction. I found myself toting up words that begin with i: individuality, imagination, initiative, inventiveness, independence of mind. Americans, it seemed to me, were more likely to think for themselves and trust their own judgments, and less easily cowed by authorities or bossed around by “experts”; they believed in their own ability to make things better.

No wonder so many smart, ambitious young Europeans look for inspiration to the United States, which has a dynamism their own countries lack, and which communicates the idea that life can be an adventure and that there’s important, exciting work to be done. Reagan-style “morning in America” clichés may make some of us wince, but they reflect something genuine and valuable in the American air. Europeans may or may not have more of a “sense of history” than Americans do. In fact, in a recent study comparing students’ historical knowledge, the results were pretty much a draw, but America has something else that matters—a belief in the future.

(I am the type of person that asks A LOT of questions; some would say I’m ‘clinically curious’. Would this fly in Europe? My thirst for knowledge, I guess, would leave me being pegged as “ignorant”? In my opinion, that’s quite contradictory in that it’s the ignorant that DON’T as questions! Hmm.. I’d like to think the natives have a better perception of what Europe is all about as opposed to a “text book” that is ridden with distortions. This reminds me of one of my favorite quotes:

“He who asks a question is a fool for a minute; he who does not remains a fool forever.” –Chinese Proverb

It’s no wonder so many Americanophobic Europeans are clueless about us. They don’t ASK! I’ve also noticed that Europeans that hate Americans tend to be way too serious and overly political – whereas on the opposite end of the extreme, Americans can be way too superficial and politically apathetic. Both extremes are nonproductive and definitely *not* healthy.)

While harsh Americanophobes online try to bring my people down, I find myself much more bonded and united with my fellow citizens especially those that are balanced liberals. Surprisingly enough though, I find myself just as bonded with the balanced and sometimes self-righteous Republicans. I know that when I’m looking for understanding, that a Republican Conservative will always be there for me and fight against Americanophobia with me. Americanophobia tries to arrogantly push-and-shove their ways and dehumanize their target: Americans. However, when you’re trying to humble a person that’s already humble (admitting the faults of their own country), the humble begin to shift and can be quite defensive thereby turning quiet patriots into noisy ones.

Most Americanophobes will tell you that Patriotism is defined as unconditionally accepting its leader and every crooked thing that a government may do. But I beg to differ. Patriotism for me is being proud of where you come from and being loyal to your country along WITH exercising the right to free speech and questioning our leaders when we see fit. That’s why I feel that you can be a patriot and be a liberal questioning the actions of the government at the same time. Now, I am still that same patriot except I feel more in tune with the “flag wavers”. This is NOT what the Americanophobes want. It want us to put our flags DOWN. It wants us to feel that we have NOTHING to be proud of and that we are all pieces of pissed-on shit deserving nothing more than death. What this is doing, however, is creating more pride among the American people. And with that, I will say the cliché saying in America: “You get more flies with honey than you do vinegar“. Americanophobia is Vinegar. Nobody’s listening.

I have yet to see any instances where Americanophobia has been constructive or useful. Americanophobia only sees the “white man”. (We can thank Michael Moore for that!) Americanophobia sees all 300 million Americans as lawless, obnoxious and retarded neo-con Christian Fundamentalists and tries to get this message out to them. But guess what? They aren’t the ones listening. Sadly and for the most part, it’s the curious, open-minded and educated liberals that are visiting your countries — that are (ironically) subjugated to your wild and woolly rants and occasional violent attacks. If we aren’t already “xenophobic”, that’s a great way to create it. Outside from the youth, most Americans are too busy to listen to your noise, anyway. We’ve already learned from the past (the 60’s), the origin of Neo-Conservatism. It sprung out as a backlash against the noisy Radical Leftists. We saw Liberals converting to Conservatism and Old Fashioned Conservatives moving the way of Neo-Conservatism. This is the result of both Americanophobia and Leftist Elitism when it gets loud and obnoxious.

“There is a belief and hope that if enough nations oppose America, the American people will realize what their government has been doing and will overthrow them. This hope is misguided, as anti-American actions are causing the opposite…” –Vexen Crabtree

And it’s all because Americanophobia cannot distinguish between the government and her people. Of course, anybody who’s Americanophobic will be ignorant to the fact that we have an electoral voting system here and how truly unfair it is (hence the term, “faux Democracy). Is Bush’s 30% all-time-low approval rating any indication that we’re not all approving of him? You guys made the same mistake with the OBESE saying that “most of us” are yet you still haven’t accounted for the 240 million that *aren’t* obese. Americanophobia refuses to learn. Americanophobia’s blind hatred toward the entire US is no better than the blind patriotism of the “flag wavers”. Americanophobia does not want to be humble, educate itself or be reasonably balanced. Americanophobia, like Homophobia, is extreme in its very nature, and is terrorism and genocide without the weapons. As you guys become noisier and noisier, we become more proud and united.

In the ideal world, it would be NICE for us Americans to have a righteous country to look up to with admiration. However, you all lose your credibility and potential respect through your hypocrisy that can be cited all too clearly throughout MOST of your rants. Another nice example that I’m very, very familiar with is noted here:

Citing a South African restaurateur’s assertion that non-Americans “have an advantage over [Americans], because we know everything about you and you know nothing about us,” Hertsgaard tells us that this is a good point, but it’s not: non-Americans are always saying this to Americans, but when you poke around a bit, you almost invariably discover that what they “know” about America is very wide of the mark.

European and Canadian Americanophobes are, if not equally ignorant, MORE ignorant than Americans. Having spoken with many Canadians and Europeans who hate people that they’ve never met, it has become painfully obvious.

Bruce Bawer continues…

America, in short, is a mess—a cultural wasteland, an economic nightmare, a political abomination, an international misfit, outlaw, parasite, and pariah. If Americans don’t know this already, it is, in Hertsgaard’s view, precisely because they are Americans: “Foreigners,” he proposes, “can see things about America that natives cannot. . . . Americans can learn from their perceptions, if we choose to.” What he fails to acknowledge, however, is that most foreigners never set foot in the United States, and that the things they think they know about it are consequently based not on first-hand experience but on school textbooks, books by people like Michael Moore, movies about spies and gangsters, “Ricki Lake,” “C.S.I.,” and, above all, the daily news reports in their own national media. What, one must therefore ask, are their media telling them? What aren’t they telling them? And what are the agendas of those doing the telling?

This is why I find those that subscribe to the Church of Americanophobia to be just as thick and as arrogant as Americans can be. Arrogance is the unwillingness to think for oneself and be the first to always prop themselves up onto a finger-pointing “thou shall not” soap-box. And my question is HOW is YOUR hypocrisy any different from the hypocrisy stemming from Christian Fundamentalists?

More hypocrisy:

Anti-Americanism in Britain has been blinded by its own propaganda which posits that America is run for the benefit of the rich at the expense of the poor – a judgement which ignores the reality of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. It also promotes the idea that American education and culture is pathetically myopic. A number of critics have confessed they have never visited the United States yet feel qualified to sit in judgment unaware that the educational provision of thirty or so American universities put Oxford and Cambridge to shame.

The left also seems to be unaware that the highest numbers of Nobel Prizes have been awarded to Americans. In the modern arts – including film, urban architecture, popular music and comedy – America is pre-eminent. The country hosts over 1700 symphony orchestras. In the more traditional forms such as the novel the achievements of leading American writers dwarf their European competitors. Accusations by the European left that Americans are a philistine people seem ridiculous when set beside their museum attendance, more than seven million visitors per year, and the quality of their literary, historical and political magazines. American freedom of the press is unequalled throughout the world and citizen access to government documents under its freedom of information laws is envied throughout Europe. American advances in medical science have saved millions of lives.

We are told we have nothing to be proud of. Could a “stupid and superficial” nation really be capable of the above? I’m not trying to hide behind the harsh fact that a significant number of Americans are stupid. What I’m trying to point out is that Americanophobic “people” aren’t any ‘brighter a bulb’ than we are!

Anti-American sentiment does not engender any alternatives to what the American government poses in the way of foreign policy – its modus operandi is simply to spread the word that the United States is the moral equivalent to the Islamo-fascism it is trying to defeat. It recites its propaganda to summon up every American failure of the past fifty years without mentioning the nation’s successes.

What good does ignoring what we’ve done right do? Oh yeah… god forbid you should be more reasonable and balanced, you might have the unfortunate consequence of seeing the flaws in your own people and own country, no?

Americanophobia doesn’t practice what it preaches – nor is it willing to stray from it’s extremes….

In its hatred of the United States the European left find excuses for the wickedness of Saddam Hussein and the evil philosophy and cruelty of Muslim fundamentalist terror groups. Some pro-Arab intellectuals/celebrities like Vanessa Redgrave have even proposed that Al Qaeda prisoners stand as parliamentary candidates in the forthcoming British general election. Labour MP George Galloway, who was an admirer of Saddam Hussein, has disseminated the idea that Iraqi terrorists have every right to kill the “American invaders.”

Americanophobia has this impression that if you travel to the US, you will find the people dressed up in stars and stripes everywhere. You’ll have this impression that all the cars and homes here will be painted and/or decorated with the American Flag. You’ll be brainwashed to believe that Americans march the streets with their flags before and after work and on the weekends after watching, “Sex in the City”. And last, but not least, you’ll think that all we talk about and have on our minds is American Patriotism and “how better our country is than yours!“.

I am here to tell all Canadians, Europeans, Australians, and those from New Zealand, that your school books and media have painfully misguided you. I am currently living in San Antonio, Texas. I should be seeing this here, right? Where are all the flags? Where are all the alleged “stars and stripes”? I see them here, but not too much of it. I will say, however, that Americans will show their patriotism when they feel threatened.

A good example would be after 9-11 where we all bonded together. And hell… my husband and I even had the flag on our car! It’s like a way of saying, “We are one nation and we will have each other’s back – and not let those people get the best of us”. I think ALL countries (especially where Americanophobia is prevalent) misinterpreted this behavior post-9-11 as “arrogance”. You can also thank your media for sensationalizing that news, as well. But ’situational US flag décor’ is not arrogance or “blind patriotism”. Look at it this way: At least I know in the US, if someone’s house gets broken into and/or a crime is committed against a person in that neighborhood, the entire neighborhood becomes closer and unites. Acquaintances become friends. We’ve got each other’s back and look after one another. Generally speaking, if Americans feel threatened (with the exception of the radical liberals), we will unite… just like any other country would under the same circumstances. Hopefully, you’ll never have to find out.

In the case that you DO find Americans marching in the streets in ’stars and stripes’ attire loudly reciting the Star Spangled Banner, consider them mentally ill, and move on.

Stupid, superficial, arrogantly/blindly patriotic, and genocidal, we are, says our “NATO friends” who live on the other side of our border and across the pond. However, if only our NATO Americanophobic friends could look in the mirror, they’d not only notice a reflection of themselves, but they would also see “the Americans“.

Show Your Love for God and the USA

In Religion, War and Politics on May 13, 2005 at 6:07 AM

Rapture Ready is the name of this site.

The site’s description is as follows:

This site is dedicated to converting hethen-liberals into God-Fearing conservatives who follow the words of wisdom of George W. Bush, reject the ACLU and pro-homosexaula agenda. I want to prepare you liberals for conversion and for the coming Rapture. R U Rapture? You better be or you will be left behind.

He welcomes you to his blog:

Hi! My name is Alberto Trippe. I am a God-fearing family man who hates the ACLU, the homosexual agenda, the liberal agenda and anyone who speaks out against God’s anointed messenger, the great George W. Bush.

God Bless the USA and George W. Bush!

In this blog I hope to get people ready for the coming Rapture.

Visit here often and I will alert you to those God-hating liberals who are trying to kill off God’s will in this the greatest place on earth, the United States of America.

He welcomes everyone to comment:

Hello. I welcome comments from everyone, especially liberals as you are in the most need of help.

I commented on his post. I told him that I needed help. I certainly hope he can find some help for me. I’m wondering if there’s a 12-step program out there for us Libs?

If anyone knows, please tell me because my Prozac isn’t working anymore.

(UPDATE!: This post is 3 years old. If you click on this guy’s blog above, you’ll notice that his post is now spam. He’s abandoned his account, however, the comments are still there.)

Virgomonkey’s Guide to Determining if Someone is Gay

In Armchair Anthropology, Religion, The Crime Library on May 13, 2005 at 1:55 AM

Disclaimer: This post is all about my disdain for the wide-spread homophobia that’s prevalent in our society.

You know how you can find out if someone’s gay? It’s really simple.

First off, there’s a difference between homosexuals (gays) and fags. Homosexuals prefer to sleep with those of the same sex. Fags are asshole gays.

Closet fags are actually more transparent and just as much (if not more) obvious than their flamboyant counterparts. How is that? If anyone you know preaches “anti-gay-isms” and is a blatant homophobe, it’s a dead give away that they are a closet fag.

My Totally Gay Boy Scout Leader The tormented Republican mayor of Spokane might have molested young boys. Boys like, well, Mark Morford

And now, this: Jim West, the Republican mayor of Spokane, a longtime serious player in regional politics and the former majority leader of the state senate and a potential Republican gubernatorial candidate and apparently one of the fiercest and most hot-tempered and most powerful Republicans in the state of Washington, is in deep trouble.

Claims are now rampant that West has used his position of power for years even since the ’70s, ever since he was a Scout leader, ever since he was handing out cute plastic trophies to young preteen boys exactly like me and actually to me in particular (I won a couple — what can I say?), West has used his position to lure men and teenage boys into having sex with him.

If you know anything about the Mayor of Spokane (Jim West), you’ve heard about his constant Anti-Gay preachings and rants – a very staunch homophobe.

Well, so what? No big deal, so far. Creepy and deceptive though it may be, West has, so far, done nothing horribly illegal. Just another powerful, closeted, hypocrite Republican (the antichoice West voted for the invidious Defense of Marriage Act in ‘98 and once proposed that teen sex be outright criminalized — not just intercourse, mind, but all sexual contact, of any kind) showing his true colors and leveraging his power to work through his rather sad boy-toy fantasies and insodoing giving all true open-hearted gay and bisexual humans who just want to celebrate their love and be left alone a very, very bad name.

Okay, let me get this straight: It’s okay to bang and fondle little boy’s private parts ruining the rest of their lives – (not to mention the whole act being non-consensual), but it’s NOT okay to have sex with someone you love before marriage?

And there it is. Not merely a sad closeted gay Republican mayor using his office to cruise for and have regular sex with all manner of incredibly young but still of-age males, but allegedly a true-blue pedophile, a child molester, a bona fide, first-class, card-carrying demon. Could it be possible?

Oh sure it is. Here are some more characteristics of a closet fags:

  • He has a macho-machismo persona
  • He brags about how tough he is
  • He’s usually very well-built and tall
  • He’s an emotional retard and has never cried once in his adult years
  • He often reminds you of his gun collection (GTL , I know you have a gun or guns too, but you don’t brag about it or try to use it to defend your manly-hood.)
  • He’s a born again Christian and whips about the bible when he’s at a loss for words.
  • Let’s just say he’s a little bit overly masculine – almost like he’s over-compensating.
  • And just like Jim West, the fanatical Republican Preacher, he’ll boast about his Anti-Gay-Pride and how teens should avoid sex until they’re 30.
  • His name is Tex Taylor.

So, if you know a person like this – even if he’s your next door neighbor and he’s very, very nice, think again. And know that every night he’s fantasizing and dreaming about having his own Neverland Ranch.

And someone should really do a national, once-and-for-all study to back up what everyone already knows — which is, of course, that the more repressed and sanctimonious and uptight you are about sex and love and gender and religion, the more likely you are to be involved in secret kink, in deep perversion, illegal perversion, perversion that crosses the line from healthy and slippery and delicious to degrading and morally reprehensible and Karl Rove. Just ask — did I say this already? — the Catholic Church.

Amen to that!

There is, of course, zero causal link between homosexuality and pedophilia. I couldn’t care less that West might be gay, or bisexual, or whatever the hell else he tells himself he is when he goes to sleep at night and dreams of, I don’t know what. Bunnies. In leather chaps. On fire.

Here’s what does it. Here’s what makes West and people like him rife with potential for, well, some of the nastiest and most dishonest and dangerous abuses humans are capable of.

It’s the ability to ignore the incredible hypocrisy of your own life.

Read more about the hypocritical homophobe here.

Read the rest of Mark Morford’s article on Jim West here.

Why am I not surprised by all of this?

Excommunicated for Not Supporting Bush?

In Censorship / Freedom of Speech, Human Waste, Religion on May 6, 2005 at 3:58 PM

Get a load out of this!

NOT GOP? You’re Excommunicated!!

Following the report that nine members of the East Waynesville Baptist Church in western North Carolina were excommunicated because they did not support President Bush in the election, Ralph G. Neas, President of People For the American Way Foundation, had the following statement:

“What have we come to when the doors of a church are closed to longtime members because of their political beliefs? When a pastor equates political support for the ‘wrong’ candidate with a sin before God?

“I would say to Senator Frist and Karl Rove that this is what comes of attempts to manipulate religion for political gain. Americans simply will not accept the claim that ‘unless you accept my political beliefs, you cannot be a good Christian.’

“This nation was founded on respect for religious belief, and tolerance for religious diversity. Men and women of faith have every right to advocate for their political beliefs. While churches, of course, can set their own membership standards, no one should punish people of faith for their political beliefs.

“This is terribly sad. I urge the President to express his opposition to all attempts to manipulate faith for political gain.”

And yet, this is just another example of our self-proclaimed, “Christians” at their best.

If you don’t emulate my thoughts, opinions, way of life, you get the boot, Charlie Brown!

The sad part about this – is that the hypocritical, Neo-Nazi, extreme right-winged, God Fearing, intolerant haters will read this and not realize that they’re one of them.

For all you mental midgets out there: Do you all really think God approves of your evil ways? I think he’s planning to burn you guys extra slowly in Hell!

Religious Extremists and Hypocrisy

In Armchair Anthropology, Human Waste, Religion on April 13, 2005 at 12:40 AM

Religious Hypocrites are a lot of fun to point out. Nine out of ten of them are Extremists on the Right Wing side.

Tonight I ventured over to one of my favorite Liberal blogs, Preemptive Karma. The entry that reads, “Bite Me” received a comment from your typical hit and run troll. The comment is as follows:

Stay off my message board, bitch.

Wow. It reminded me of the frequent troller, Maddie Dog, that prowls through liberal blogs leaving nasty comments. Maddie Dog even left a really nice comment for me on this entry. Mind you, Extremists from the right side hate celebrity talk. Do you think people are just sometimes too lazy to read your blog description and/or your category section? I don’t know about you, but if I run across a blog or a blog entry that I don’t like, I just move on. Life’s too short to ruin your entire day over what a stranger has typed into their blog. And if that’s their biggest worry in life, I call them very lucky.

Going back to the Preemptive Karma Blog and this entry where a troll left this friendly message, if you click on the troll’s blog, you’ll notice that she’s a self proclaimed “Christian” and ‘appears’ to be very “religious”. She also has an in depth comment policy plus a rant (in another entry) where she complains about the habits of other bloggers. It is most interesting to see that she is guilty of doing EXACTLY what she tells her own readers what not to do. I couldn’t help but to laugh. And boy, did I hear that pot calling the kettle black!

But those are your Religious Hypocrites for yah.

There are only a very few people that call themselves Christians, that are actually very kind and “Christian-like”. All the others are extremely evil, violent, insensitive, callous, greedy, materialistic, intolerant, judgmental, racist, and filled with hate.

Let me give you some snippets from The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience: Why don’t Christians live what they preach? By Ronald J. Sider

The Depth of the Scandal
How bad are things? What is the depth of the scandal? Unless we face these questions with ruthless honesty, we can never hope to correct the problem.

Whether the issue is divorce, materialism, sexual promiscuity, racism, physical abuse in marriage, or neglect of a biblical worldview, the polling data point to widespread, blatant disobedience of clear biblical moral demands on the part of people who allegedly are evangelical, born-again Christians. The statistics are devastating.

Materialism and the Poor
John and Sylvia Ronsvalle have been carefully analyzing the giving patterns of American Christians for well over a decade. Their annual The State of Christian Giving is the most accurate report for learning how much Christians in the richest nation in human history actually give. In their most recent edition, they provide detailed information about per-member giving patterns of U.S. church members from 1968 to 2001. Over those thirty-plus years, of course, the average income of U.S. Christians has increased enormously. But that did not carry over into their giving. The report showed that the richer we become, the less we give in proportion to our incomes.

In 1968, the average church member gave 3.1 percent of their income—less than a third of a tithe. That figure dropped every year through 1990 and then recovered slightly to 2.66 percent—about one quarter of a tithe.

As evangelicals we claim to embrace the Bible as our final authority. One of the most common themes in the Scriptures is that God and his faithful people have a special concern for the poor. Why this blatant contradiction between belief and practice?

Racism
In 1989 George Gallup Jr. and James Castelli published the results of a survey to determine which groups in the U.S. were least and most likely to object to having black neighbors—surely a good measure of racism. Catholics and nonevangelical Christians ranked least likely to object to black neighbors; 11 percent objected. Mainline Protestants came next at 16 percent. At 17 percent, Baptists and evangelicals were among the most likely groups to object to black neighbors, and 20 percent of Southern Baptists objected to black neighbors.

To say there is a crisis of disobedience in the evangelical world today is to dangerously understate the problem. Born-again Christians divorce at about the same rate as everyone else. Self-centered materialism is seducing evangelicals and rapidly destroying our earlier, slightly more generous giving. Only 6 percent of born-again Christians tithe. Born-again Christians justify and engage in sexual promiscuity (both premarital sex and adultery) at astonishing rates. Racism and perhaps physical abuse of wives seems to be worse in evangelical circles than elsewhere. This is scandalous behavior for people who claim to be born-again by the Holy Spirit and to enjoy the very presence of the Risen Lord in their lives.

Uhg.

John Paul I, John Paul II, and Child Molesters

In Religion, The Crime Library on April 2, 2005 at 3:47 PM

WARNING: YOU WILL BE OFFENDED BY THE BELOW IF YOU ARE EITHER MOURNING OVER THE DEATH OF POPE JOHN PAUL II OR HAVE LIKED HIM. PLEASE DON’T CONTINUE TO READ THIS IF THAT IS THE CASE.

While the rest of you are mourning the death of Pope John Paul II, I’ll be mourning for Pope John Paul I.

I’m sorry, I just cannot feel saddened by the death of Pope John Paul II nor was I ever moved by his words or actions. Even when he forgave the man that shot him doesn’t move me because he was a Pope and that’s what they’re expected to do. I would have done the same if I had a reputation to uphold. I’m sure it would have been a lot harder for him to have “forgiven” if it were a woman that shot him.

Please don’t expect me to be fair, balanced, or understanding of the pope. I can’t. I can’t be objective or rational because the two things that anger me the most are non-consensual sex with children and
chauvinism.

The fact that he looked the other way while all these problems were happening in churches all over is criminal. He is no better than the priests guilty of destroying the innocence and trust in the souls of little boys.

Pope John Paul II was guilty for aiding and abetting child molesters. In this country, we are arrested for this crime. Well, both of these crimes: for child molesting and aiding and abetting.

But I guess you really cannot blame Pope John Paul II. If he had done anything about said crimes committed against our innocent children, he would have mysteriously died of a heart attack too.

Islam Teaches us How Women Should Be Treated

In Blame Canada, Blame Europe, Religion, Strange News on March 29, 2005 at 10:13 PM

Islam teaches us how women should be treated:

The purpose of women is to serve the male they belong to. In what ever way we require them to. Women rights are a joke. They are beneath us in all things. When my woman opens her mouth without being told to do so, she is beaten like a dog. All women must be put in their place. Corrupted western values need to stay in the west. Leave US ALONE devil spawn.

Some people are just feeding them by the spoon load – while I’m sitting here watching the show. It’s impossible to empower a group of people you aren’t afraid of. (Now, that I check their blog three years later, they have deleted all their comments.)

You know what makes me laugh even harder, though?

For all we know, these two “punks from Kabul” could be two lesbian lovers living in Germany laughing themselves silly watching us acting like pathetic morons.

WTF?

In Religion, War and Politics on March 26, 2005 at 6:17 PM

I just found the below comment to this entry in CURSE the CONSCIOUS or Funky Fresh Freddie’s blog.

You are the fucking pussy and we are going to send you to hell. We will not be there when you get there. All westerners are losers. Allah has embraced us and empowered us to clean the world of your kind.

Perdition overtake both hands of Abu Lahab and he will perish.
His wealthand what he earns will not avail him.
He shall soon burn in the fire that flames.
And his wife,  the bearer of fuel.
Upon her neck a halter of strongly twisted rope.

In the name of Allad,the Beneficent,the Merciful

Musa |

Homepage |
03.26.05 – 5:21 pm | #

Visit Two Guys from Kabul

Speaking out against all evil infidels.
1.In the name of Allah,the Beneficent, the Merciful
2.All praise is due to Allah, the Lord of the worlds
3.The Beneficent, the Merciful
4.Master of the day of Judgement.
5.Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help
6.Keep us on the right path
7.The path of those upon whom Thou hast bestowed favors.Not(the path)
of thoseupon whom Thy wrath is brought down norof those who go away.

8O

Jesus is Watching You!

In Religion, Strange News on March 3, 2005 at 1:18 AM

Yes, Jesus IS Watching You!

INSTRUCTIONS: Stare at this picture for 30 seconds, then close your eyes, tilt your head back a little and you will see a picture of Jesus. Next, stare at the picture for 30 seconds, and look at a blank wall. Then if you like, print out the picture and go outside. Stare at the picture 30 seconds, and then look into the sky. You will see Jesus!

If you’re in a hurry, just stare at the picture for thirty seconds and then look at the wall!

My Very Own Ten Commandments

In Religion on March 2, 2005 at 8:03 PM

Court Considers Government Displays of The Ten Commandments

Sheesh! What’s the big fuss over? Just put them all over the place. I don’t care. But how about let’s add to them? Or better yet, let’s look at my version of them! (Click the thumbnail to view Virgomonkey’s Version of the Ten Commandments. Click the screen again to view it even larger.)


OK! Your turn. Add to the list if you have any clever additions to amend to the Ten Commandments.

Hell, Fire, and Masturbation!

In Censorship / Freedom of Speech, Religion, Strange News on February 25, 2005 at 10:56 PM

Christian Fanatics say no to SEX TOYS!

Uh oh……

A US state’s prohibition on the sale of sex toys was left standing by the US Supreme Court on Tuesday when the court refused to hear a constitutional challenge to the law.

The United States’ highest court declined to consider the complaint from users and vendors of paraphernalia for sexual stimulation, the sale of which is banned in the southeastern state of Alabama.

I guess there aren’t too many blind people with hairy palms and wart-ridden hands walking around in Alabama.

Adopted in 1998, the Alabama statute blocks the distribution of “any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human sexual organs”. Violators risk up to 10,000 dollars in fines and one year in prison.

In July an appeals court affirmed that Alabama had the right to proscribe commerce in sex toys, reasoning that it potentially opened the door to illegal activities such as prostitution. The court added that if Alabamians wanted to reverse the law, they had recourse through the state legislature.

So, masturbation leads to prostitution? This is too funny! I think it’s safe to assume that just about every man commits this “Anti-Christ” act of evil. So, tell me…. how many of you men out there are prostitutes?

In refusing to hear the case, and making no comment on it, the Supreme Court effectively accepted the lower court’s judgment.

The American Civil Liberties Union, a leading defender of private citizens’ rights which joined the plaintiffs in the case, argued that sex toys “have many recognized beneficial uses and are used by consenting adults in deeply private acts that are beyond the reach of governmental regulation”.

I think I’m going to move to Alabama to learn from these people. My blackened soul needs some cleansing.

And did you know….. masturbation is UN-American too?

President Bush is proud to introduce an ambitious new phase in the fight to preserve all that is decent in America. Conceived and championed by the revered Republican think tank Americans for Purity, “Operation Infinite Purity” is dedicated to the complete eradication of masturbation from American soil by the year 2008.

According to this website masturbation is a “Democrat-Created Crisis” !!!! But the “un-American”, “un-patriotic”, “communist”, and “Anti-Christ” AmErIkAnz are trying to fight back!


Shame on the Liberals that created this uproar!

And while you’re at it……..


….because we know that God hates fags.

BLAME CANADA!

Defrocked Priest Sentenced for Raping Boy

In Armchair Anthropology, Religion, The Crime Library on February 17, 2005 at 11:51 PM

Priest Found Guilty in Molestation Case

This is great news!

BOSTON
- Defrocked priest Paul Shanley, whose crimes shook the Roman Catholic Church, was sentenced to 12 to 15 years in prison on child rape charges Tuesday to a burst of applause from some of the many who accused him of molesting them.

Shanley will be eligible for parole after eight years. He was sent away despite warnings from some inmate advocates that the notorious child-molester would be a marked man behind bars and that prison could amount to a death sentence.

I’m generally against prison violence, but when it comes to rapists and child molesters, I say, “Go get ‘em!” because that child’s life is basically ruined and he will have to carry those memories (repressed or not) with him for the rest of his life.

Judge Stephen Neel condemned the former priest for using his revered status to prey on a little boy. It is difficult to imagine a more egregious misuse of trust and authority,” he said. Shanley, once known for a being a hip “street priest” who reached out to troubled children and homosexuals, was convicted last week of repeatedly raping and fondling a boy at his church during the 1980s.

Is this not the norm? You know, the “altruistic humanitarian” type who successfully portrays himself as such. Everybody thinks he’s wonderful. This is the face he shows when he’s got his pants on. Nobody can believe he could possibly do such a thing. For those idiots who believe in his innocence, let me ask you a question: Do you think if a priest is secretly banging little boys behind closed doors, do you think he’s going to say mass and walk around in public wearing a shirt that says, “I Diddle Little Boys”? In your naive, idealistic, “the world is perfect” little mind of yours, do you actually think he’s going to expose that side of himself to his parishioners – like he wants to get caught with his pants down? (pun intended). Give me a break!? And yes, Scott Peterson is guilty too. Cute people are capable of bad things as well.

We have a lot of criminals who are known to others as altruistic. Remember Ted Bundy?

Friends remember Bundy as witty, kind, and attractive, as well as charming. These were all to be his assets as a killer. Ironically, Bundy worked for some time at a crisis clinic, answering phones, and talking people down from suicide. In 1970, Ted saved a 3 and 1/2 year old from drowning in Green Lake. As far as most people were concerned, he saved lives, he didn’t take them.

Very Nice Serial Killers/Mass Murderers

We can somehow accept the fact that a few people go “crazy” sometimes and start shooting others. However, it is more disconcerting to learn that some of the “nicest” people one meets lead a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde life: a student by day, a killer of coeds by night; a caring, attentive nurse who secretly murders sick children, the handicapped, or the elderly; a building contractor and politician who enjoys sexually torturing and killing young men and burying them under his home. When we discover that people exist who are not considered to be insane or crazy but who enjoy killing others for “recreation,” this indeed gives new meaning to the word “stranger.”

Psychopathic Serial Killers as Neighbors

Do you ever notice how whenever the media asks the next door neighbors of a psychopathic serial killer what the guy was like, the neighbors always say how nice, quiet, and peaceful the guy was? They also usually mention how nicely the guy kept up his lawn for some reason. They always talk about what a nice neighbor he was. Well, the media just seems to be shocked by the whole thing. I’m not saying anything about the other aspects of their personalities, but could it be possible that psychopathic serial killers actually do make the best neighbors in America? Everyone wants to move far away from these people; maybe the best way to avoid being their next victim is to, in fact, live next door to them. They’ll let you read the morning newspaper in peace, or blast your music at night all you want, as long as you don’t mind them sawing people into “convenient for the freezer” sized pieces or the occasional loud shriek of terror by a helpless victim.

The point of me saying this was not to say that psychopathic serial killers actually make better neighbors than anyone else, but to show the absolute stupidity behind the news media asking these questions of the neighbor. Of course they were peaceful, THEY DIDN’T WANT TO GET FUCKING CAUGHT, COLUMBO! What did they expect these people to say, that the guy stood around all day in his front lawn with a South Park T-shirt on, an iced tea in one hand, a bloody axe in the other, with an insane glaze on his eyes as he leered at passing children.

So, next time you find a quiet, reserved, friendly man living in your neighborhood who seems like a pretty good neighbor, take him over an apple pie or something. After all, he could be a serial killer, and you wouldn’t want an outstanding neighbor like that to move out of the neighborhood.

The Organized Type

The organized killer is usually socially adequate and has friends and lovers, often even a spouse and children. They are the type who, when captured, are most likely to be described by acquaintances as ‘a really nice guy, he couldn’t hurt a fly’.

Now, back to the Pedo-Priest…..

I leave you with the following quotes:

More than two dozen people have accused Shanley of molesting them, but this was the only case to result in criminal charges.

The victim’s wife told Shanley in court:

“No words can ever explain my disgust for you. You are a coward. You hid behind God.”

“You robbed my little boy of his innocence,” the accuser’s father said. “You destroyed his understanding of good and bad and right and wrong.”

Sad.

God Loves Fags!

In Religion, Strange News on February 17, 2005 at 11:23 PM

Yes, that’s right! Remember the site God Hates Fags.Com, and my entry about it? Well, a blog was established to counteract this named, “God Loves Fags“. Their mission statement is as follows:

This blog is intended to give an alternate (positive) viewpoint regarding reconciling religion and homosexuality. We abhor hate in all forms and advocate love and acceptance. Yeah, it’s a little touchy-feely but far better than the alternatives.

So,… God Hates “Fags”, Now?

In Religion, Strange News on February 17, 2005 at 10:43 PM

 

(Click the thumbnails above to view the full pictures.)

The Westboro Baptist Church homepage

Established
in 1955 by Pastor Fred Phelps, the Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) of
Topeka, Kansas still exists today as an Old School (or, Primitive)
Baptist Church. See the WBC Monograph. In short, we adhere to the
teachings of the Bible, preach against all form of sin (e.g.,
fornication, adultery, sodomy), and insist that the doctrines of grace
be taught publicly to all men.

"GOD HATES FAGS" — though
elliptical — is a profound theological statement, which the world
needs to hear more than it needs oxygen, water and bread. The three
words, fully expounded, show:

  • the absolute sovereignty of "GOD"
    in all matters whatsoever (e.g., Jeremiah 32:17, Isaiah 45:7, Amos 3:6,
    Proverbs 16:4, Matthew 19:26, Romans 9:11-24, Romans 11:33-36, etc.),
  • the doctrine of reprobation or God’s "HATE"
    involving eternal retribution or the everlasting punishment of most of
    mankind in Hell forever (e.g., Leviticus 20:13,23, Psalm 5:5, Psalm
    11:5, Malachi 1:1-3, Romans 9:11-13, Matthew 7:13,23, John 12:39-40, 1
    Peter 2:8, Jude 4, Revelation 13:8, 20:15, 21:27, etc.), and
  • the certainty that all impenitent sodomites (under the elegant metaphor
    of "FAGS" as the contraction of faggots, fueling the fires of God’s
    wrath) will inevitably go to Hell (e.g., Romans 1:18-32, 1 Corinthians
    6:9-11, 1 Timothy 1:8-11, Jude 7, etc.)

The only
lawful sexual connection is the marriage bed. All other sex activity is
whoremongery and adultery, which will damn the soul forever in Hell.
Heb. 13:4. Decadent, depraved, degenerate and debauched America, having
bought the lie that It’s OK to be gay, has thereby changed the truth of
God into a lie, and now worships and serves the creature more than the
Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen! Rom. 1:25. But the Word of God
abides. Better to be a eunuch if the will of God be so, and make sure
of Heaven. Mat. 19:12. Better to be blind or lame, than to be cast into
Hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched. Mk. 9:43-48. Abstain,
you fools.

Most of the major Confessions of Faith throughout the history of the New Testament Church have also advanced these ideas. So,
even though the Arminian lies that "God loves everyone" and "Jesus died
for everyone" are being taught from nearly every pulpit in this
generation, this hasn’t always been the case. In fact, if you are in a
Church that supposedly believes the Bible, and you are hearing these
lies, then your church has apostatized.
If you are interested in
this subject, we encourage you to do some independent research on the
history of the Church from Adam to now and, more importantly, we encourage you to carefully read the entire Bible.

Sad.
And what’s worse than that is that there are people all around us that
feel the same way as these people do. The only difference between these
people and others sharing the same beliefs just keep quiet about it.
Scary.

According to this "religious" group,

    God hates…

  • "fags",
  • Americans (too many fags),
  • Bush (because he doesn’t do anything about the "fags"),
  • Sweden (because there are too many "fags" there),
  • Topeka, Kansas (because there are too many "whores" there),
  • priests (because they are all "fags"), and
  • all other "fag", pre-marital and extra-marital sex supporters and doers.

The members of The Westboro Baptist Church
firmly believe and dictate that Aids is God’s punishment to "fags".
They jubilate this dreadful disease and all mass disasters and
tragedies that happen because…

By all that is just, God
is fully entitled to utterly destroy the nation immediately. The fact
that instead He gave us a fair warning on September 11 is something
that those who fear and obey God as all mankind is bound to do are
thankful for this warning. Of course, the perverse people of this evil
nation are not getting the hint, and instead of repenting in sackcloth
and ashes, they continue to spit in God’s face. "And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not." Revelation 2:21.

Gay hating’ congregation to picket six local churches Sunday

Father
John Hooker of St. Andrew’s Episcopal Church believes in turning the
other cheek. He says his church welcomes all people, including
homosexuals and those who hate them.

"We believe that in our baptism we are all made God’s children," says Hooker.

St.
Andrew’s Episcopal is one of six local churches to be picketed by
members of the Westboro Baptist Church, a self-admitted "gay hating"
congregation based out of Kansas.

~Questions & Answers~

Doesn’t the Bible say that God loves everyone?

…Or,
you are thinking of "God is love." God certainly is love, toward His
elect (His children). But He certainly is not love toward the reprobate
(children of the devil). That’s why His elect go to heaven, and the
reprobate go to hell. In Romans 9:13, which says "As it is written,
Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated", Jacob is a representative
of God’s elect, while Esau is a representative of the reprobate. In
Romans 1, the word "reprobate" is used to describe fags. Fags are
reprobate. God hates reprobates. Therefore, God hates fags.

Why do you preach hate?

"Because the Bible preaches hate…"

Doesn’t God forgive everyone?

No.
God will have mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He
hardeneth (Romans 9:18). God is sovereign, and does whatsoever he will
in the army of heaven and amongst the inhabitants of the Earth, and
none can stay his hand. You must come to term with two facts, which are
extremely difficult for the flesh to grasp: First, God does not exist
to serve you, you exist to serve him.

Why do you picket funerals?

To
warn the people who are still living that unless they repent, they will
likewise perish. When people go to funerals, they have thoughts of
mortality, heaven, hell, eternity, etc., on their minds. It’s the
perfect time to warn them of things to come. Is it mean, hateful,
uncompassionate, etc.? I’m sure it is, according to your standards.
However, according to my standards, it would be infinitely more mean,
hateful, uncompassionate, etc., to keep my mouth shut and not warn you
that you, too, will soon have to face God.

Why don’t you leave it up to God and stop wasting your time telling people that they are wrong?

"The
heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked; who can
know it? I, the Lord, search the heart, I try the reins, even to give
every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his
doings." (Jeremiah 17:9-10). This being the exclusive prerogative of
God, we leave it alone, knowing that we can never convince someone that
they are doing something wrong.


How do you feel about people who confess and realize their sins?

Based
upon 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, there is a scriptural basis to believe that
it is possible for a practicing fag to repent. On the other hand, Jesus
Christ taught that "no man can come to me, except the Father which has
sent me draw him." (John 6:44). In Romans 1, on three separate
occasions, it says that God has given homosexuals up to uncleanness (v.
24), vile affections (v.26) , and to a reprobate mind (v. 28). If he
has given them up to these things, he is not simultaneously drawing
them to Christ. These verses are not incongruous, because if Christ
died for them, the Holy Spirit will surely call them, God will in fact
draw them, they will leave off that uncleanness, vile affections and
reprobate mind, and the inevitable result will be that they will
inherit heaven and not hell. Therefore, a fag who has truly repented is
no longer a fag.

Are you associated with a milita, Aryan Nation, Nazi, KKK, or any other similar group?

No.
We don’t believe in physical violence of any kind, and the Scripture
doesn’t support racism. God never says "thou shalt not be black."
However, He does say, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with
womankind: it is abomination." (Leviticus 18:22).

The only true Nazis in this world are fags…

Are you a sinner? If so, does this mean you will burn in hell, or are you better than these people?

Of
course I’m a sinner. All have sinned and come short of the glory of
God, and if any man says he has not sinned he’s a liar. I am no better
than any homosexual. No human is good of his or her own accord. The
only righteousness that God recognizes is the righteousness that he
gives. His righteousness is a single heart, humble, contrite and
broken, devoted to God. And the only way a heart becomes this way is by
God touching it and making it that way.

The difference between
me and a defiant, practicing homosexual, is grace. When the grace of
God operates on the heart of a human, that human desires to obey God
and live soberly and righteously. And when that happens, that person is
profoundly impressed with his sinful nature, and falls on his knees
begging God’s mercy. And God has mercy on that heart. Then, and only
then, a true spirit of repentance exists, and forgiveness follows.

What about lesbians?

Lesbians are just female fags.

Why are you so harsh?

Because
the truth is harsh. We use great plainness of speech, and will not beat
around the bush when it comes to someone’s eternal soul. Watch out for
those people who tell you that it’s okay to be gay – they’ll take you
to hell with them.

Doesn’t the Bible say to love your neighbor?

Yes.
Does that mean to lie to him and tell him what he wants to hear? No. It
means to tell him the truth, and warn him to flee from the wrath to
come. …

Why do you fly the American flag upside down?

An
upside down flag is the international sign for distress. This country,
as well as the rest of the world, is in mortal danger – we’re in
distress. Our national support of perversity is bringing God’s wrath
upon us. September 11 was only the beginning. We have reached the point
of no return. It is too late for this evil country to repent (2
Chronicles 36:16, 2 Kings 23:26). God’s people must save themselves
from this perverse generation (Acts 2:40).

You can get the rest of this inane gobbledygook here.

I don’t know why, but for some odd reason this "churchy" group reminded me of these people.

I
realize the people of Westboro Baptist Church are not your typical
"born again Christian" fanatics or what we would call religious people,
by any means. To say "taking it to an extreme"
would be an understatement. I am just baffled. Yet, I’m not surprised
by this behavior as I can feel the hate coming from those who quietly
protest. The "It’s MY WAY or the Highway" people will never cease to exist, and they will always try to solicit their bile from one generation to the next.

I
don’t necessarily think religion has everything to do with it. Some of
us are taught to hate (just because), and many people feel uneasy and
insecure around anything or anybody that’s different. This goes with
culture, race, physical appearances, mental illnesses, religion,
mannerisms, values, and sexual preferences.

I criticize in this entry, yet I am no "higher being" as I sometimes am guilty of "hating" as well.

The Truth about Kwanzaa

In History, Religion on February 17, 2005 at 10:24 PM

Kwanzaa: Made Up By A Convicted Felon

“On December 24, 1971, the New York Times ran one of the first of many articles on a new holiday designed to foster unity among African Americans. The holiday, called Kwanzaa, was applauded by a certain sixteen-year-old minister who explained that the feast would perform the valuable service of “de-whitizing” Christmas. The minister was a nobody at the time but he would later go on to become perhaps the premier race-baiter of the twentieth century. His name was Al Sharpton and he would later spawn the Tawana Brawley hoax and then incite anti-Jewish tensions in a 1995 incident that ended with the arson deaths of seven people.

Great minds think alike. The inventor of the holiday was one of the few black “leaders” in America even worse than Sharpton. But there was no mention in the Times article of this man or of the fact that at that very moment he was sitting in a California prison. And there was no mention of the curious fact that this purported benefactor of the black people had founded an
organization that in its short history tortured and murdered blacks in ways of which the Ku Klux Klan could only fantasize.

It was in newspaper articles like that, repeated in papers all over the country, that the tradition of Kwanzaa began. It is a tradition not out of Africa but out of Orwell. Both history and language have been bent to serve a political goal. When that New York Times article appeared, Ron Karenga’s crimes were still recent events. If the reporter had bothered to do any research into the background of the Kwanzaa founder, he might have learned about Karenga’s trial earlier that year on charges of torturing two women who were members of US (United Slaves), a black
nationalist cult he had founded.

ACCORDING TO COURT DOCUMENTS, Karenga’s real name is Ron N. Everett. In the ’60s, he awarded himself the title “maulana,” Swahili for “master teacher.” He was born on a poultry farm in Maryland, the fourteenth child of a Baptist minister. He came to California in the late 1950s to attend Los Angeles Community College. He moved on to UCLA, where he got a Master’s degree in political science and African Studies. By the mid-1960s, he had established himself as a leading “cultural nationalist.” That is a term that had some meaning in the ’60s, mainly as a way of distinguishing Karenga’s followers from the Black Panthers, who were conventional Marxists.”

Many of you probably already know about this already. I recently was having a conversation about this with my brother, and I just had to look this up for myself.

I find it very important that this holiday exists for African Americans, and I see absolutely nothing wrong with it. I do, however, find it’s origin very interesting, and it came as quite a surprise to me.

Since the beginning of electronic greetings on the internet, I had often seen Happy Kwanzaa cards as I was perusing through the holiday assortment during every Winter Season. I had always wondered what that “Kwanzaa” meant. I only knew that it was an African American holiday.

“Anywhere we are, Us is.”

“Kwanzaa is supposed to be celebrated from 26 December through 1 January: It competes with Christmas and Chanukah while incorporating some echoes of both, e.g., gift-giving and a ceremony built around a seven-holed candle-holder that recalls Judaism’s seven-branched menorah.”

The author, William J. Bennetta, continues….

“Karenga has concocted some bits of lore, lingo, and mumbo-jumbo that are intended to make Kwanzaa look like something out of Africa instead of something from Los Angeles County, but his efforts have been feeble. If you scan The Official Kwanzaa Web Site, you’ll read that the origins of Kwanzaa lie in “the first harvest celebrations of Africa,” which allegedly “are recorded in African history as far back as ancient Egypt and Nubia” — but there is no explanation of why any ancient Egyptians or Nubians might have held harvest festivals around the time of the winter solstice, and there is no identification of the crops that they harvested. Karenga’s formula for celebrating Kwanzaa requires the use of two ears of maize — but maize is a New World plant, and it wasn’t known at all in ancient Africa.

In Karenga’s Kwanzaa-lingo, ears of maize are called by the Swahili name “muhindi.” In fact, all the objects that Karenga has worked into Kwanzaa have names taken from Swahili, which The Official Kwanzaa Web site describes as “a Pan-African language” and “the most widely spoken African language.” The labeling of Swahili as a “Pan-African” language is rubbish. Swahili — a Bantu tongue that includes many words absorbed from Arabic, from Persian and from certain Indian languages — is spoken by some 50 million people (i.e., about 7% of Africa’s population). Most of those Swahili-speakers are concentrated in eastern Africa, in a region that includes Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania and a strip of Zaire. The language which is used most widely in Africa is Arabic; and indeed, Swahili was originally written in Arabic script

Kwanzaa is a hoax — a hoax built around fake history and pseudohistorical delusions. By attempting to dignify and promote Kwanzaa in The American Nation, Prentice Hall has joined in a flim-flam.”

It doesn’t sound like the founder of Kwanzaa knows much about his own roots, and had no problem creating
this holiday on a lie. Nonetheless, he is a man due no amount of respect.

If it weren’t for Ron N. Everett, someone else would probably have invented a similar holiday. As I see in several different cultures world-wide, depending on the ethnicity, the celebration of the Holiday Season is done differently and are very moving to observe. I don’t know why I feel this way, but I find that other cultures appear to stick together more so than that of the American culture. This is not to say I’m not proud of my American heritage, but I do feel we are somewhat drawn apart from one another.

Upon observing other cultures practicing their rituals, sometimes I become so moved that I cry. I think this is because I envy them and wish Americans only had the same type of bonding between one another.

I admire the way that the African Americans stick up for each other. Although, I have to say that’s inconvenient when it comes along to a predominantly all African American jury deciding the fate of an African American defendant as with the case of OJ Simpson. I guess you can’t have it both ways. Nevertheless, I think you get my point.

Culture is a beautiful thing to observe. The Kwanzaa Holiday, whether it be founded by a criminal or not, if the African Americans are happy celebrating it, good on them!